Posted by: bradpierce | 2008/12/06

The wasteful electrical power grid

Two-thirds of the energy used by the electrical generation and distribution system never reaches the end user.

The unit cost of electricity is high because most of the energy that must be purchased to generate it does not actually reach the end user but is expended in creating the electricity and moving it to the point of use. In 2000, for example, approximately 40 quadrillion Btu of energy were consumed by the electric power sector to generate electricity in the United States, but only 12 quadrillion Btu worth of electricity were actually used directly by consumers. Where did the other 28 quadrillion Btu go? Energy is never destroyed but it does change form.  The chemical energy contained in fossil fuels, for example, is converted at the generator to the desired electrical energy. Because of theoretical and practical limits on the efficiency of conversion equipment, much of the energy in the fossil fuels is “lost,” mostly as waste heat. (The overall energy efficiency of a system can be increased through the tandem production of electricity and some form of useful thermal energy. This process, known as cogeneration, reduces waste energy by utilizing otherwise unwanted heat in the form of steam, hot water, or hot air for other purposes, such as operating pumps or for space heating or cooling.)

In addition to the conversion losses, line losses occur during the transmission and distribution of electricity as it is transferred via connecting wires from the generating plant to substations (transmission), where its voltage is lowered, and from the substations to end users (distribution), such as homes, hospitals, stores, schools, and businesses.  The generating plant itself uses some of the electricity.  In the end, for every three units of energy that are converted to create electricity, only about one unit actually reaches the end user.

More …

More blog entries about sustainability.


Responses

  1. According to Technology Review

    Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.

  2. According to EE Times

    One recent study estimated the U.S. alone will need to spend more than a trillion dollars by 2030 just on its energy transmission and distribution networks. By contrast, even the $4.3 billion for smart grids in the recent stimulus package “is a drop in the bucket,” he said.

  3. According to David Strahan

    However, engineers at Chubu University in Kasugai, Japan, have been testing a 20-metre length of HVDC [high-voltage direct current] superconducting cable and they believe it could eventually revolutionise electricity distribution. The team, led by engineer Satarou Yamaguchi, have come up with a new cable design that can be cooled more effectively and store up to 4 megajoules of magnetic energy per kilometre. Use thousands of kilometres of this cable as an HVDC line and it would act as a giant battery, Yamaguchi suggests, helping to smooth the output from solar or wind. Superconducting HVDC cables have been proposed for linking grids on the east and west coasts of the US, as well as to transport electricity generated in the oil-tar fields of Alberta in Canada to southern California.

  4. Could be some useful solutions on Nigel Melville’s WordPress blog, Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability.

  5. According to Michael Noble

    America’s aging electrical transmission system is renewable energy’s Achilles heel, and unless a broad policy consensus to upgrade our electrical grid is forged soon, the potential of wind and solar power will be vastly diminished.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories